Mapping the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Product Design Methods: Literature Review

  • Widyastuti Widyastuti Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong
  • Erni Suparti Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Setia Budi
  • Alva Edy Tontowi Departemen Teknik Mesin dan Industri, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Abstract

Identification of user needs and their conversion into product specifications is an important stage in the product design process. The large number of design methods currently available is a challenge for designers in choosing an effective and efficient design method. The aim of this literature review was to identify the use of product design methods between 2019-2023, mapped the effectiveness and efficiency of existing product design methods. Identification process used bibliometric analysis of articles in the SCOPUS database. VOSviewer software was used in the analysis process with co-occurence type and full-counting calculation methods. Effectiveness mapping was based on 7 criteria (E1 - E7) and efficiency based on 3 criteria (F1 - F3). The identification results show that the design methods that have been widely used in the last five years were value engineering, quality function deployment, user centered design, universal design, kansei engineering and TRIZ. The mapping results show that effective and efficient methods were QFD and value engineering. The effectiveness and efficiency of other methods were explained in more detail in this review.

Keywords: method, design, product, effectiveness, eficiency

References

Alavizadeh, A., 2010. Usage Of Axiomatic Design Methodology In The U.S. Industries, International Journal Of Modern Engineering.

Asonja, T.O., 2022. Journal of Material Sciences & Manufacturing Research 1–7.

Atabay, Ş., 2021. Tehnicki Vjesnik 28, 2164–2172.

Atabay, Ş., 2023. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies 8, 1–11.

Buakum, D., Deasa, C., Sinthavalai, R., Noppasri, K., 2023. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing.

Burgstahler, S., 2021. Universal Design: Process, Principles, and Applications [WWW Document]. URL https://www.washington.edu/doit/universal-design-process-principles-and-applications (accessed 12.27.23).

CA, M., 2023. History of Value Engineering [WWW Document]. URL https://www.mcgill.ca/ve/history (accessed 12.27.23).

Caporaso, T., Bellitti, P., Grazioso, S., Serpelloni, M., Sardini, E., Lanzotti, A., 2023. Comput Aided Des Appl 20, 87–98.

Cavique, M., Dodun, O., Brown, C., 2021. Axiomatic Design as an innovation framework, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing Ltd.

Clauer, D., Fottner, J., Rauch, E., Prüglmeier, M., 2020. Usage of Autonomous Mobile Robots Outdoors - An Axiomatic Design Approach, in: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp. 242–247.

Cordan, Ö., Gülbahar, S., 2023. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 20, 413–427.

Du, J.L., Liu, S.F., Javed, S.A., Goh, M., Chen, Z.S., 2023. IEEE Trans Eng Manag.

Erkarslan, O., 2022. Int J Med Educ 16.

Fenech, A., Francalanza, E., Azzopardi, M.A., Micallef, A., 2019. Kansei engineering over multiple product evolution cycles: An integrated approach, in: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp. 76–81.

Ferreira, J.M., Acuña, S.T., Dieste, O., Vegas, S., Santos, A., Rodríguez, F., Juristo, N., 2020. Inf Softw Technol 117.

Fink, P.D.S., Doore, S.A., Lin, X., Maring, M., Zhao, P., Nygaard, A., Beals, G., Corey, R.R., Perry, R.J., Freund, K., Dimitrov, V., Giudice, N.A., 2023. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 179.

Gad El Mola, K.M.S., 2023. Journal of Engineering Research.

Germann, R., Schröder, N., Matthiesen, S., 2022. Appl Ergon 99.

Ilevbare, I.M., Probert, D., Phaal, R., 2013. A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation.

Inoue, M., Suzuki, W., Yamada, S., Aoyama, K., 2021. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing 15.

Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF, 2016. What is User Centered Design? [WWW Document]. URL https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/user-centered-design (accessed 12.27.23).

John Clarkson, P., Coleman, R., 2015. Appl Ergon 46, 235–247.

Kille-Speckter, L., 2022. The evolution of inclusive design: A first timeline review of narratives and milestones of design for disability.

Kirakowski, J., HFRG, Bevan, N., 2016. A user-centred approach to design and assessment, in: Handbook of User-Centred Design. INUSE, pp. 8–17.

Lamirande, M., 2020. Two Barriers to Inclusive Design [WWW Document]. URL https://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/design/barriers-to-inclusive-design/ (accessed 1.7.24).

Lian, W., Wang, K.C., Li, Y., Chen, H.Y., Yang, C.H., 2022. Math Probl Eng 2022.

Lin, K.C., Miao, W., Liao, W.Y., 2022. Heliyon 8.

Lin, Z.H., Woo, J.C., Luo, F., Pan, G.Q., 2023. Math Probl Eng 2023.

Liu, Z., Wu, J., Chen, Q., Hu, T., 2023. Alexandria Engineering Journal 65, 797–808.

Maia, L.C., Alves, A.C., Leão, C.P., 2015. How could the TRIZ tool help continuous improvement efforts of the companies?, in: Procedia Engineering. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 343–351.

Moore, A., Boyle, B., Lynch, H., 2023. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 18, 1453–1465.

Moran, D., Ertas, A., Gulbulak, U., 2021. Designs (Basel) 5.

Nagamachi, M., 2017. History of Kansei Engineering and Application of Artificial Intelligence, in: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. pp. 357–368.

Patel, P., 2021. Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Efficiency, Natl J Community Med.

Preiser, W.F.E., Smith, K.H., 2014. Universal Design Hand Book. Mc Graw Hill, New York.

Septiani, V.P.R., Ushada, M., Suharno, 2023. Pertanika J Sci Technol 31, 2947–2960.

Souchkov, V., 2016. A Brief History of TRIZ.

Stratton, R., Mann, D., Otterson, P., 2000. TRIZ Journal.

Uğural, M.N., 2023. Tehnicki Vjesnik 30, 292–301.

Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D., 2016. Product Design And Development sixth Edition. Mc Graw Hill, New York.

Ux, M., 2019. User-Centered Design - History [WWW Document]. URL https://www.merixstudio.com/blog/user-centered-design-canvas-digital-product-design/ (accessed 12.27.23).

Wang, M., Cheng, X., Liang, J., 2021. IEEE Access 9, 138791–138802.

Wang, N., Kang, X., Wang, Q., Shi, C., 2023. Concurr Eng Res Appl 31, 49–63.

Wangphanich, P., Kongprasert, N., 2022. Management and Production Engineering Review 13, 3–15.

Wolniak, R., 2017. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series 2017, 553–564.

Yang, C., Yuan, B., Ye, J., 2023. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing 17, JAMDSM0062.

Yang, C.M., Deng, W., 2023. Alexandria Engineering Journal 63, 427–440.

Yang, T., Gao, X., Dai, F., 2020. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition) 33.

Yang, W., Cao, G., Peng, Q., Sun, Y., 2021. Comput Ind Eng 162.

Yuzhe-Qi, Kiesu-Kim, 2023. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing.

Zitkus, E., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., 2013. The limits of inclusive design in the current design practice, in: Green Design, Materials and Manufacturing Processes - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Intelligent Manufacturing, SIM 2013. Taylor and Francis - Balkema, pp. 539–544.
Published
2024-05-14
Section
Articles